Bengal Election Exit Polls (2016) clearly indicating Didi Mamata Banerjee is coming back in power with massive mandate by defeating opportunist alliance of Lefts plus Congress. Also if it happens it will be a major defeat for yellow journalism of ABP group and Mr. Aveek Sarkar.

Mamata Banerjee is all set to win one of the toughest electoral battle of her life against all odds.

It seems people of Bengal is with their beloved Didi Mamata Banerjee as all major Exit Polls showing that in West Bengal Trinamool Congress is coming back in power. 

Hope my viewers will remember that in our opinion poll survey we have predicted Trinamool Congress’s win in Jan’16 and we are the first to show in our exit poll on 05^th May’16 that TMC (AITC) is going to win 183 (+/- 15) seats. That’s the figure is coming today if you sum up all exit polls.

Link of our exit poll (05/05/16): http://mamatimanushofwb.blogspot.in/2016/05/bengal-poll-2016-final-exit.html
 
Link of our opinion poll (Jan’16): http://mamatimanushofwb.blogspot.in/2016/01/opinion-poll-survey-for-2016-west.html
 
This victory of Mamata Banerjee wasn’t easy as all media, central government, central agencies and opportunist oppositions joined hands together to malign Trinamool Congress and Mamata. 

Apart from it lots of conspiracy sting operation and some unfortunate tragedy also happened just before West Bengal Assembly Election, still now it’s clear that Mamata Banerjee is winning this historic battle.

If you see overall National prospective this time Assam, Tamil Nadu and Kerala have voted for change according to various exit polls shown on TV channels but West Bengal has bucked the trend by re-electing Trinamool Congress led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee who managed to hold on to power by defeating the Left-Congress alliance convincingly for a second consecutive term, the polls showed.

Hope now National Media (Mainly Saffronic and Leftist Media) will at least rectify their way of thinking about Mamata Banerjee and will focus more on her developmental works than negative campaign as per advice/guidance of anti-Indian leftist goons.

This result is also a big defeat for ABP group and particularly for Mr. Aveek Sarkar it’s a personal defeat.

Please read this article to know the details of it:

Bengal Election 2016: Irony of Politics (Part-2)....

Link  http://mamatimanushofwb.blogspot.in/2016/05/bengal-election-2016-irony-of-politics.html

Please see other posts in this blog page by clicking "Home" or from "My favorite posts" / "Popular Posts" / "Archives" sections, and if any remarks please post. 
Thanks & Vande Mataram!! Saroop Chattopadhyay.

Marichjhapi Massacre was the first of many mass-rapes and second genocide by CPIM lead Left Front in West Bengal. Marichjhapi Massacre by Communists can be compared only with the Jalianwala Bag massacre perpetrated by the British.

Marichjhapi was the second genocide by CPIM in Bengal after Snaibari (Bardhaman) massacre in 1970. You may say it’s beginning of genocide era. Soon after coming to power in Bengal, communists of India lead by CPIM did Marichjhapi Massacre and mass rape in 1979. Later on West Bengal was also witnessed lots of brutality by these communists during their 34yrs of ruling.

Some of the famous massacre/genocide/mass-rapes brutalities by these killer communists are:

Snaibari massacre in 1970

Marichjhapi genocide in 1979

BijanSetu massacre in 1982

Bantala Mass-Rape & murder Case in 1990 

 ChotoAngaria massacre in 2001

Dhantala incident of Mass-Rape case in 2003

 Singur – Tapasi Malik’s rape & murder in 2007

Nandigram Violence (massacre) - Mass killing and rape by Police plus CPIM cadre in 2007

Netai Killing (Masscre)  in 2011

  

And many others

The massacre in Marichjhapi is an ideal example of how an ideologically debauch, reactionary, pseudo fascist political force could unleash the oppression and atrocities upon helpless destitute, who seek to bring some form of betterment in their lives.

The only and only reason why those people in Marchjhapi were targeted was, they were able to live decently without being under any political umbrella and this could have been fatal for the party of institutional political proletariat or any other ‘mainstream’ political force.

The massacre in Marichjhapi, which took place under CPIM rule in Bengal between January 26 and May 16, 1979, has few parallels in the history of independent India. 

It holds fair comparison with the Jalianwala Bag massacre perpetrated by the British. The level of police brutality was horrific. The entire island of refugees was put under economic blockade from January, after the Left had come to power the previous year promising to champion the cause of the refugees. The blockade first starved out the population, and then the killings began.

When police action failed to persuade the refugees to leave, the State Government ordered the forcible evacuation of the refugees, which took place between May 14 to May 16, 1979.

The men were first separated from the women. Most of the young men were arrested and sent to the jails and the police began to rape the helpless young women at random. 

At least several hundred men, women, and children were said to have been killed in the operation and their bodies dumped in the river.

Photographs were published in Anandabazaar Patrika and the Opposition members in the State Assembly staged a walkout in protest. Prime Minister Desai, wishing to maintain the support of the Communists for his government, decided not to pursue the matter.

4,128 families perished in transit, died of starvation, exhaustion, and many were killed in Kashipur, Kumirmari, and Marichjhapi by police firings. The CPIM congratulated its participant members on their successful operation at Marichjhapi and made their refugee policy reversal explicit by stating that “there was no possibility of giving shelter to these large number of refugeesunder any circumstances in the State”.

In a final twist to the episode, the CPIM settled its own supporters in Marichjhapi, occupying and utilizing the facilities left behind by the evicted refugees. The issues of the environment and the Forest Act were forgotten.

The subsequent silence in the Bengali academic community about what so many knew had happened at Marichjhapi is a great example of cultural hijack of speech by Communists.

Now after so many years and after the end of Left era peoples started observing  "Marichjhapi Diwas"; this year too we observed “Marichjhapi Diwas” on 13^th May.

 Please see other posts in this blog page by clicking "Home" or from "Popular Posts" / "My Favorite Posts" / "Archives" sections, and if any remarks please post. 

Thanks & Vande Mataram!! Saroop Chattopadhyay.

West Bengal secondary school examination – WBSSE (madhyamik pariksha)----: the reason behind, STUDENTS OF DISTRICT SCHOOLS ARE SHOWING BETTER RESULTS IN MADHYAMIK compare to kolkata’s elite schools …..YEAR AFTER YEAR

LETS    RETHINK…RE EVALUATE…RE CONSIDER
FOR     READJUSTMENT AND RENOVATION……..

A-FROM PREPARATION POINT OF VIEW

·        Students of district schools are not pressurized with surprise tests, block tests or unit tests .They have only half yearly and selection before final exam, as a result they get sufficient chance to organize themselves and prepare themselves for upcoming Board Examination.

Contradictory to this, Kolkata’s students have no compromise on their monthly tests /surprise tests.

Kolkata’s elite school’s students are so busy preparing for these small tests that they hardly have time to organize themselves for Finals.

·        The district schools have half yearly exams after summer vacation- whereas a student of the Kolkata’s school finishes his or her half yearly (after 1^st unit test) in hurry just before summer vacation only to prepare for his or her next unit test which is scheduled immediately after summer vacation.

How helpful are these unit tests ….Think it over…

·        Another point to note down is the city schools have prescribed different kinds of study materials and books for Madhyamik students- in addition to their regular syllabus books. However the district students do not have any such compulsion and pressure.

The extra load entrusted on the students –is it solving the purpose…Think it over…

B- FROM ‘SUPPORT STUDY' POINT OF VIEW-

·        Students from remote villages give equal importance to all the subjects –let it be language, history or geography. On the other hand city kids have psychological inclination towards Science and Math.

·        Students of city are more dependent on coaching classes and private tuition.

Are these coaching classes an independent entity or are they supposed to be a support for regular school activity…Think it over…

·        A Metro city child has associated stress too… like stress of various hobby classes may it be cricket, music, drawing etc. Special coaching for various competitive exams [which are scheduled after 3 years] are also in thing in city.

Contradictory to this – a district child seems to have only one goal i.e. pass Madhyamik with best result and rest will follow accordingly.

·        In villages the concept of Group Study is still very prevalent .A Group Discussion method helps the child to understand the topic better , improve his or her ability to work on any topic critically and also sustain interest in the topic.

City kids on the other hand are more competitive. They are dependent on coaching classes, guide books and various educational sites-which claims to bring best out of an average student.

These sites and Guide books need to question their ability. Can critical thinking develop without interaction and exchange of idea…Think it over…      

C- FROM 'LIFE STYLE’ POINT OF VIEW-

·        A student from city is always in competitive mood. It is always a horizontal competition in city i.e. A <->B.  On the other hand a district child still follows the pattern of vertical competition i.e. A will compete with himself or herself.

City student prefers to discuss their studies through various social networking sites. Instead of peaceful study they end up in various kinds of distractions.  

D-FROM ‘RELATIONSHIP’ POINT OF VIEW-

·        In district schools –the teacher and students relationship is still very pious and intimate. Teachers are readily available for students any time of the day. Contrast to this in city schools child will have to wait till next morning or may be next working day to get there doubts cleared. In span of long gap student may lose interest or focus on the question which was knocking there mind. 

E- FROM EXAMINERS POINT OF VIEW-

·        Don’t you think that examiner always have a soft corner for district student as Examiners  are aware that district students are with less facilities and lesser opportunities.

F-FROM ‘SYLLABUS' POINT OF VIEW-

·        May be syllabus hence set for Madhyamik Board is such that district students find it easy to co relate to the topic compare to a child from city.

                                                                                    

                                       JUST

                             RE THINK RE EVALUATE                        

                                        AND     

                               RE CONSIDER

(This article was written with the help and guidance, advice of Ex Head Examiner of WBSSE Board and some senior teacher, councilor, students and guardians)

Please see other posts in this blog page by clicking "My favorite posts" or "Home" or from "Popular Posts" / "Archives" sections, and if any remarks please post. 
Thanks & Vande Mataram!! Saroop Chattopadhyay.